Answer to the double bar problem


Applying equation ( 1b) to each component in turn to ascertain the weakest link . . . .

component 1 :       n1 = ( A S / P )1 = 100 x 600 / 50 E3 = 1.2
component 2 :       n2 = ( A S / P )2 = 200 x 400 / 50 E3 = 1.6
assembly :       n   = minimum ( n1, n2) = 1.2
On the face of it therefore the assembly (and every component thereof) is safe, since all safety factors exceed unity.

BUT . . . .

Equation ( 1b) was derived on the assumption that the stress is uniform across the cross-section, so equation ( 1b) can be applied

only when the stress is uniform
force paths in double bar

But clearly the stress cannot be uniform in component #2 at least, since the load is transmitted through the 100 sq.mm contact area at the LHE of #2 as suggested by the force pathson the sketch. Assuming that the stress is approximately uniform across the contact area, then

component 2 :       n2 = ( A S / P )2 = 100 x 400 / 50 E3 = 0.8
assembly :       n   = minimum ( n1, n2) = 0.8
It is concluded that the assembly is NOT safe.

It is apparent that although the cross-sectional area of #2 is constant from one end to the other, the effective area through which the load is channeled is not constant. So when we refer to the safety factor of #2 as being 0.8, we're referring to the minimum safety factor which corresponds to the LHE here.



Valid HTML 4.0!     Copyright 1999-2000 Douglas Wright,   doug@mech.uwa.edu.au
      last updated 20 Feb 1999